Ripple’s proposed lending system for banks and payment companies is moving closer to activation on the XRP Ledger (XRPL), as key network amendments attract additional validator support. However, the proposals remain short of the approval threshold required to begin the launch process.
As of the November 10 voting snapshot, the SingleAssetVault amendment had 23 supporting votes, while LendingProtocol and its first update, LendingProtocolV1_1, each had 22. The proposals need 29 votes from the network’s 35 trusted validators before a two-week activation countdown can begin.
XRPL lending amendments gain support
The XRP Ledger uses an amendment process to introduce changes to its underlying software. Network validators vote on proposed upgrades, and an amendment becomes eligible for activation only after receiving support from more than 80% of the relevant validator group for 14 consecutive days.
That requirement translates into 29 affirmative votes out of 35. Reaching the threshold does not activate a feature immediately; the support must remain above the required level throughout the two-week period.
According to the XRPL amendment tracker, the latest November 10 figures showed:
- SingleAssetVault: 23 votes, six short of the threshold.
- LendingProtocol: 22 votes, seven short.
- LendingProtocolV1_1: 22 votes, seven short.
The figures represent progress from October 19, when the lending amendment had 19 votes and the vault proposal had 21. The November 11 tracker continued to show the same respective totals, indicating that support had not increased further in the latest reported snapshot. Validator voting records provide the dated breakdown.
Uncollateralized loans shift credit risk
The proposed framework would allow users to deposit XRP and other supported tokens into single-asset vaults. These pools would provide funding that loan brokers could distribute through fixed-term lending agreements.
Unlike conventional secured lending, the proposed model permits loans without borrower collateral. Instead, it relies on off-chain underwriting and risk management, meaning brokers must assess borrowers’ creditworthiness outside the blockchain.
Brokers would also contribute first-loss capital, designed to absorb initial losses before depositors’ funds are affected. This arrangement provides a layer of protection, but it does not eliminate default risk.
Ripple has presented the lending framework as a potential tool for payment companies that need liquidity while cross-border transactions are being settled. If adopted, it could expand the financial services available through the XRP Ledger beyond payments and token transfers.
Developers prepare for lending activation
Development work is continuing while validators consider the proposals. A November 4 GitHub pull request, #8685, proposes a third lending amendment, LendingProtocolV1_2. It is designed to improve transaction handling when competing loan requests involve the same broker.

Meanwhile, the cleanup amendment, which addressed problems in the lending code, reportedly went live on November 4 at ledger 108,112,129.
Not all XRPL proposals have gained support. ConfidentialTransfer declined from 22 to 21 votes, while DynamicMPT fell from 18 to 16. Public tracking records show vote totals but do not identify individual validators responsible for changing their positions.
Conclusion
The XRP Ledger’s lending upgrade has made measurable progress, but activation remains dependent on validator consensus. SingleAssetVault needs six additional votes, while LendingProtocol requires seven. Even after reaching 29 votes, both must maintain the required support for 14 consecutive days. Until those conditions are met, the proposed lending system remains under development rather than live on the network.
Sources & Methodology
Primary-source standard: Market-moving facts should link to original data releases, regulator notices, company filings or official project announcements whenever available. Secondary reporting is used for additional context, not as a substitute for original evidence.
Page last reviewed:
